Processing software: DENZO(integration) SCALEPACK(scaling)
Using MTZ column labels: FP SIGFP
NOTE: Not doing Bayesian estimation because corrected Is or Fs were input.
Unit cell and space group: 41.983 41.983 320.544 90.00 90.00 120.00 'H 3'
Nominal diffraction range: 106.848 2.211
Input reflection count: 10552
Unique reflection count: 9636
Diffraction cut-off criterion: Local mean I/sd(I) = 1.20
Diffraction limits & principal axes of ellipsoid fitted to diffraction cut-off surface:
2.104 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.894 a* - 0.447 b*
2.104 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 b*
2.177 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 c*
GoF to ellipsoid (d*): 0.0267 Fraction of surface points fitted: 100.0% ( 2797 / 2797)
Number of unobserved reflections inside ellipsoid: 10
Number of observed reflections inside ellipsoid: 9626
Number of observed reflections outside ellipsoid: 0
Lowest cut-off diffraction limit:
2.581 at reflection 2 1 -122 in direction 0.016 a* + 0.008 b* - c*
Worst diffraction limit after cut-off:
2.552 at reflection 7 7 66 in direction 0.105 a* + 0.105 b* + 0.989 c*
Best diffraction limit after cut-off:
2.211 at reflection 0 6 -135 in direction 0.044 b* - 0.999 c*
NOTE that because the cut-off surface is likely to be only very approximately ellipsoidal, in part
due to variations in reflection redundancy arising from the chosen collection strategy, the
directions of the worst and best diffraction limits may not correspond with the reciprocal axes,
even in high-symmetry space groups (the only constraint being that the surface must have point
symmetry at least that of the Laue class).
Fraction of data inside cut-off surface: 99.9% ( 9626 / 9636)
Fraction of surface truncated by detector edges: 98.6% ( 871 / 883)
WARNING: Diffraction of the input data has probably been truncated due to an inappropriate
(an)isotropic diffraction cut-off applied in previous processing, or the diffraction pattern may
have extended beyond the edges of the detector. In the latter case consider the possibilities of
either moving the detector closer or swinging it out, having carefully checked in the former case
that this will not create a risk of spot overlap.
Fraction of total surface above threshold truncated by cusp(s): 0.9% ( 8 / 896)
Scale: 2.23635E-02 [ = factor to place Iobs on same scale as Iprofile/100.]
Beq: 37.47 [ = equivalent overall isotropic B factor on Fs.]
B11 B22 B33 B23 B31 B12
Baniso tensor: 37.63 37.63 37.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTE: The Baniso tensor is the overall anisotropy tensor on Fs.
Eigenvalues of overall anisotropy tensor (Ang.^2), eigenvalues after subtraction of smallest
eigenvalue (as used in the anisotropy correction) and corresponding eigenvectors of the overall &
anisotropy tensor as direction cosines relative to the orthonormal basis (standard PDB convention),
and also in terms of reciprocal unit-cell vectors:
Eigenvalue #1: 37.63 0.49 ( 1.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000) 0.894 a* - 0.447 b*
Eigenvalue #2: 37.63 0.49 ( 0.0000, 1.0000, 0.0000) b*
Eigenvalue #3: 37.14 0.00 ( 0.0000, 0.0000, 1.0000) c*
The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the overall B tensor are the squares of the lengths and the
directions of the principal axes of the ellipsoid that represents the tensor.
Angle & axis of rotation of diffraction-limit ellipsoid relative to anisotropy tensor:
0.00 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000
Anisotropy ratio: 0.013 [ = (Emax - Emin) / Beq ]
Fractional anisotropy: 0.007 [ = sqrt(1.5 Sum_i (E_i - Beq)^2 / Sum_i E_i^2) ]
Eigenvalues & eigenvectors of mean I/sd(I) anisotropy tensor:
1.77 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.894 a* - 0.447 b*
1.77 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 b*
1.45 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 c*
Eigenvalues & eigenvectors of weighted CC_1/2 anisotropy tensor:
0.287 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.894 a* - 0.447 b*
0.287 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 b*
0.251 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 c*
Eigenvalues & eigenvectors of mean K-L divergence anisotropy tensor:
0.738 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.894 a* - 0.447 b*
0.738 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 b*
0.673 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 c*
Eigenvalues & eigenvectors of mean I/E[I] anisotropy tensor:
3.68E-01 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.894 a* - 0.447 b*
3.68E-01 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 b*
3.31E-01 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 c*
Ranges of local mean I/sd(I), local weighted CC_1/2, local mean K-L divergence, local mean I/E[I] and D-W factor [= exp(-4 pi^2 s~Us)]:
ISmean CChalf KLdive IEmean DWfact
0 Grey Unobservable*
1 Blue Observable*
2 Red|Pink:9 1.20 0.3000 1.847 0.847 0.0552
3 Orange 4.07 0.8313 2.679 1.006 0.1238
4 Yellow 7.28 0.8840 3.475 1.108 0.2436
5 Green 11.81 0.9195 4.068 1.225 0.4200
6 Cyan 14.77 0.9315 4.520 1.361 0.6345
7 Magenta 15.80 0.9410 4.904 1.487 0.8400
8 White 16.18 0.9446 4.977 1.538 0.9745
* Refer to GLOSSARY for explanation of terminology.
The cut-off surface uses a different color scheme:
Unmeasured points are blue (inside the fitted surface) or cyan (outside).
Unobserved points are red (in) or green (out).
Observed points are orange (in) or white (out).
The fitted surface is magenta.
Anisotropic S/N ratio: 0.07 [ = max_h | exp(4 pi^2 s~_h delta(B) s_h) - 1 | <I_h/sd(I_h)> ]
The 'anisotropic S/N ratio', unlike the 'anisotropy ratio' or the 'fractional' anisotropy shown
above, in addition to the anisotropy of the B tensor, takes both the diffraction and the local mean
I/sd(I) into account.
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of observed acentric Z probability (before, after): 0.00 0.00
Estimated twin fraction from Britton histogram for k,h,-l operator (strong, all): 0.48 0.48
Estimated twin fraction from Murray-Rust plot for k,h,-l operator (strong, all): 0.04 0.23
Estimated twin fraction from weighted Fisher & Sweet plot for k,h,-l operator: 0.47
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |delta-Z| probability for k,h,-l operator: 0.44
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |H| probability for k,h,-l operator: 0.45
Estimated twin fraction from Britton histogram for -h,-k,l operator (strong, all): 0.48 0.48
Estimated twin fraction from Murray-Rust plot for -h,-k,l operator (strong, all): 0.00 0.08
Estimated twin fraction from weighted Fisher & Sweet plot for -h,-k,l operator: 0.01
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |delta-Z| probability for -h,-k,l operator: 0.00
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |H| probability for -h,-k,l operator: 0.00
Estimated twin fraction from Britton histogram for -k,-h,-l operator (strong, all): 0.50 0.50
Estimated twin fraction from Murray-Rust plot for -k,-h,-l operator (strong, all): 0.00 0.08
Estimated twin fraction from weighted Fisher & Sweet plot for -k,-h,-l operator: 0.01
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |delta-Z| probability for -k,-h,-l operator: 0.00
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |H| probability for -k,-h,-l operator: 0.00
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of unrelated acentric |delta-Z| probability: 0.00
Padilla & Yeates L test for twinning, acentric moments of |L|:
<|L|> (normal = .500; perfect twin = .375): 0.530
<L^2> (normal = .333; perfect twin = .200): 0.366
Estimated twin fraction from K-L divergence of |L| probability: 0.00
Reference